Blog Post due Tuesday 11:59PM or in class on Wednesday at 9:05AM

Homework due Tuesday Nov 30 11:59PM:

R
ead Barbara Ehrenreich's “Maid to Order: The Politics of Other Women's Work” 479-495 and compose a blog response based on ONE of the following prompts:

1. Consider what audience this piece was written for. What assumptions does Ehrenreich make about this audience?

2. Consider Ehrenreich's ethos. What is the central argument of this piece? In what ways does her personal experience build her case?

3. Ehrenreich incorporates a range of research and statistics into her essay. Which statistical examples surprised you? Which are most persuasive? Least persuasive? Why?

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Maid to Order


1. Consider what audience this piece was written for. What assumptions does Ehrenreich make about this audience?


It seems that Ehrenreich wrote this chapter for those who hire maids in order to make them more aware of the industry's reality. She does this by writing about the physical and societal affects of hiring maids, as well as an idea of the profession from a maid's perspective, like on page 481 where she shares her description of a ghostlike existence during her experience as a maid, "she would remain completely unaware of your existence unless you were to crawl under that table and start gnawing at their ankles. The quotation, "It's a different world down there below knee-level, one few adults voluntarily enter," implies that she thinks the majority of the audience's understanding of the maid profession doesn't go beyond the fact that maids clean houses. Ehrenreich also seems to stress the fact that the audience is unaware of the affect of a parent hiring a maid or nanny because she provides many examples, of awful things kids have done, like the boy who kicked his nanny for refusing to make sandwiches, and embarrassing things kids have said, like "look mommy a baby maid." She also explains long term effects of hiring maids, such as "domestic incompetence," as well as the increase in "callousness and solipsism" of "the served."

2 comments:

  1. I feel that the article was not directly aimed at the "cleaning industry" with women. I feel it was more into the relationship that women have had with cleaning as well as how society looks at " cleaning and women." She does talk about the kind of relationship women have with cleaning.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree that this was written for those who hire maids/cleaning people to clean their houses. I like how you incorporated those quotes into your response; I don't know if i necessarily agree with Ehrenreich's statement however, I think that the cleaner's experience varies from household to household; not every cleaning person will go by completely unnoticed unless they were to 'crawl under that table and start gnawing at ankles'. I do, however, believe that this exaggeration helps make her point stronger, as she is speaking from first hand accounts.

    ReplyDelete